|
Returning from his mid day bath in the Ganga, and thus
in a state of unusual ritual purity, the master and pupils
found a Chandala in their path. The chandalas are the
untouchable castes, even the shadow of whom is supposed
to pollute the brahmin. The disciples urged the man to
move aside with harsh words. Whereupon the chandala directly
questioned Shankara. " You preach the live long day that
the atman and the Brahman are the same, the only imperishable
truth and that all distinctions are barriers in the realization
of that supreme truth. So am I to move my body, which
is a transient state of being or my atman which is eternal?
How come you have such distinctions as brahmin and chandala
still in your mind when you argue that the imperishable
atman is the same in all people? You preach the Brahman
and identify with the bodily differences amongst people."
Shankara immediately realized that he had been provided
a great lesson on walking the talk and prostrated himself
before the chandala, stating that anybody who has the
consciousness fixed in the Self like this was his guru.
It is a measure of his greatness that he could do so unhesitatingly
and a measure of the degeneration of India that this story
is still a valid one in a social context. After this lesson
Shankara's power seemed to grow even more. He traveled
the length and breadth of the country holding disputes
on the nature of the soul and the true faith, and everywhere
he went he was triumphant in establishing his point of
view. As one over-enthusiastic biographer put it, " Other
philosophies howl like jackals in the woods, but all flee
when roars the Lion of Vedanta." He was by now universally
known as Shankara-acharya, Shankara the Teacher. The heads
of the maths or monasteries that he founded
all over India are still called Shankaracharchayas after
him.
There remained only two great rivals in India. Kumarila
Bhatta and his disciple Mandana Mishra maintained the
supremacy of the ritualistic path to god. Kumarila was
on the verge of death when Shankara finally met him, but
the old warrior was impressed by the young lion and asked
him to have a Tarka, or organized debate with his disciple
on the value of their different viewpoints. Mandana Mishra
was at first skeptical in meeting a sannyasi in philosophic
debate, having no time for 'shaven headed vagabonds' as
he put it. To his discomfort however he was losing on
every point of argument that was raised and he had almost
nothing left in his quiver. His wife, Bharati, saved him.
This lady was so learned that even Shankara had accepted
her as the judge in the debate between him and her husband!
It says a lot about the times and also about the position
of women in those days.
The good lady raised the valid point that since the issue
at stake here was the claim that each had the supreme
and complete knowledge of all valid learning Shankara
was hopeless at one aspect of that. Since he was a celibate
since childhood he had no understanding of sexual relations
and his perspective on life and moral and ethical issues
was thereby limited. Shankara, to the amazement of all
concerned, agreed that it was indeed a valid point and
took a three-month break from the debate to learn about
this thorny issue. The legend says that he infused his
spirit into the body of a dying king and spent the next
three months in learning about this fascinating subject.
Since his body never touched a woman he was technically
celibate, though he got the knowledge he wanted. He returned
with his new found knowledge and convincingly won the
debate. Mandana and his wife became his disciples. Then
the classifying, codifying intellect of the brahmin proved
too much for him and the great Shankara wrote a Kama-sutra
to record his experiences! He had great intellectual integrity
and he did not think that any aspect of knowledge is not
a worthy thing. It is a standing embarrassment to all
the pious and devout to this day and hurriedly passed
over in conversation and impossible to find as a text.
Shankara intuited that his mother was going to die and
hastened back to Kerela to keep his promise. When he announced
to his brahmin neighbors that he was resolved to perform
her funeral rites they excommunicated him and refused
to even give firewood for the cremation. (A sannyasi is
dead to the world and cannot perform ritual actions.)
They did not know the formidable will of the man they
were dealing with, not of his utter indifference to any
law but that of his soul. He heaped up dry plantain stems
(which are still mostly water) around his mother's corpse
and allowed it to smolder away to nothing. The brahmins
of Kaladi were degraded in status by the king when he
got to know how they had treated the great acharya.
This done he took to the road again, traversing India
in a great out-flame of energy. He was always up and doing,
preaching, writing, establishing monasteries, reestablishing
and purifying abandoned sites of worship, and upholding
the flag of the Vedanta. It is interesting that though
he was an incarnation of Jnana, pure knowledge, he is
also a great Bhakta, devotee, and he did a lot for those
who wished to follow the path of worshipping the personal
God. By now his life was coming to an end and he traveled
to Kashmir and the temple of Mother Sharada there. The
southern gate had never been opened in the temple as nobody
from the south of India could pass the gauntlet of questions
posed by the resident scholars. Shankara took this act
of rudeness as personal challenge and beat off all comers
in the rather surreal debate that took place as he victoriously
advanced to the inner sanctum and the throne of knowledge
there. Finally he went to Kedar in the Himalayas and literally
disappeared in the midst of the intense cold and snows.
Shankara was only 32 when he died but he had created the
shape of Hinduism for the next 1200 years. Even the Kumbha
mela is supposed to have been organized by him. In theological
terms, the Advaita Vedanta is about as far as the Mind
goes. There is nothing beyond it as a theory; there is
only experience. Shankara's impact on the country is therefore
immense. India lives mostly by the parameters he designed
for religious life even today.
- Rohit Arya
<<back
Archive
|