|
Works
such as this put one in a dilemma. For you want so desperately
for the country to have a creative animation film on one
of the oldest epics of the world. In consequence you are
prepared to be pleased, indeed even determined to be pleased,
by what you view.
And then the actual product itself erodes your determination.
Simply put the quality of animation is very high indeed but the
script by Narendra Sharma, an authority of sorts, is an unfortunately
mediocre one. It just doesn't match the breadth of vision of the
animators, and takes on board every sentimental and melodramatic
cliché that has become an accretion on the public perception of
the great epic. The grand scale of animation is just not matched
by the pedestrian emotions and tired-out platitudes offered as
significant ethical lessons. It is like looking at a gorgeous
picture with an irritating soundtrack that has been mistakenly
tagged onto it.
The
storyline is more or less the same, as one would expect, though
it is based on the Ramcharitmanas of Tulsidas not the Ramayana
of Valmiki. This makes for a significant shift in how Rama is
viewed - as a god not as a great hero - and exaggerates the miraculous
element in the story. For instance the bridge across the sea to
Lanka is no longer a great engineering feat as it was in Valmiki;
it is a floating miracle, held up by faith in the buoyancy that
Rama's name written on each rock provides it.
The
animation was done with Japanese collaboration and it would
seem with quite a bit of Japanese funding. As a result, many
historical anachronisms and delightful incongruities creep in.
Rama and Laxmana for instance are portrayed as bare-chested
samurai warriors, complete with topknot. The swords used are
actually the Chinese long knife, with its characteristic sash,
not the Indian double-edged straight blade which would have
been historically accurate. The fights staged with these swords
are also the best ever seen on an Indian screen as the Japanese
have a great and ongoing kenjutsu tradition, unlike the Indians
who were always mediocre swordsmen at best. The famous bows
of the great archers are not the Indian composite bow as would
be expected but the six foot samurai bow with its off-centre
haft. The characteristic features of manga and animae Japanese
cartoon tradition run through this production too, exaggerated
eyes that fill up a face, tiny lips and shrill voices. All of
which is actually fun, the Ramayana has long been nativised
throughout Southeast Asia the most famous example being Indonesia's
Ramminkein. This merely follows in that tradition.
One really funny example of cultural stereotyping occurs when
Ravana is shown watching a dance performance. The costume is pure
Mata Hari, a nineteenth century vision of the lure of the exotic
and voluptuous Orient - and the dancing girl has six arms to simultaneously
make as many mudras as can be communicated.
Such
moments are very rare however, and most of the time you get the
exaggerated groans and moans of the Jatra and Nautanki to signify
pain and sorrow. Rama barely escapes coming off as a mealy-mouthed
prig. Sita is a squeaky damsel in distress. Laxmana is reduced
to a nonentity while Hanuman is no longer Hanuman but the great
Chinese culture hero - Monkey. He gets a good line in the tradition
of all action films where witticisms and wisecracks precede violence.
He is going to teach these rakashas a lesson and besides he needs
the exercise! Ravana is depicted as a great bad-tempered thundercloud.
As his rage gets warmer his extra heads begin to pop out of his
shoulders!
The war sequences are really magnificent and only animation could
do justice to them, as we do not have the budgets for a "cast
of thousands". The island-fortress of Lanka is shown in a brooding
Dark Towers style that suggests evil quite palpably. Certain scenes
of sylvan beauty capture the myth of pastoral in a hard glittering
style. But these are compensations that you are driven to look
for, because the story is so weakly executed. The script has also
tampered with many of the sequences, primarily how Rama kills
Ravana with a chakra instead of by shooting him in the navel as
the tradition holds. Indrajit and Laxmana have this aerial joust,
which is magnificent to view, but really superfluous to the tale.
Hanuman's lifting of the Sanjeevani hill is a sequence that is
worthy of the animator's art. About the emotional scenes and the
attempts at conveying moral lessons, let us draw over them the
veil of charity.
In short the film is an ingenious attempt that falls far short
of its attempted mark. However we really have nothing better to
put in its place so de facto it will have to do for now. It can
give you a few moments of visual pleasure and it may be a convenient
introduction for very small children to the epic, but it could
have been better. Ram Mohan is India's premier animator and along
with his Japanese collaborators could have given us a better product.
The price seems a bit steep for something that doesn't run for
even two hours.
RAMAYANA
The Legend of Prince Rama
Excel Productions audiovisuals Pvt. Ltd.

Also Read
The Ramlila Festival
- Spectator participants in God's life
|